On the consequence of this study, some tips can be produced for further methods linked to conflict solution. During the related literary works, fundamentally personal skills studies (Openshaw, Mills, Adams, Durso, 1992), telecommunications and you can troubleshooting studies (Clarke Greenberg, 1986; DeForest Hugles, 1992; Long Adams, 2001) and you will behavioural means (Robin, Patrica, Moye, 1995; Electricity, 1992) were chosen for degree away from conflict quality. Yet not, intellectual behavioural procedures were effective in ent out of conflict solution experiences (Hoyer, Fecht, Louterback Schneider, 2001; Spillane-Grieco, 2000). This efforts contributes that people can buy even more fulfillment using their relations.

You will find several restrictions and that dictate generalization ones overall performance. Basic, the research is actually limited level of participant and you can try are hired from university students. For this reason, new samplecan not be depict all of the teenage. 2nd, parents-kids interactions are tested that with worry about-declaration actions and you can anly off adolescents’ perspective. So it methods gives limited information about relations. Third, individuals’ feeling about relation was checked specific lifetime of interaction, perhaps not across the period.

Upcoming studies might be imitate today’s analysis as well as attempt out of people of some age and you will community. Morever, moms and dads kids interactions shall be reviewed having fun with different ways such as for instance videotaped otherwise lead observance. Observational education you will render details regarding the particularly family members and you can parents’ effect on loved ones is regarded as in the next degree. This study will likely be frequent in certain periods within the christiandatingforfree a good longitudinal data that may render a whole lot more realistic performance.

Addis, J. Bernard, Yards. E. (2002). Relationship changes and unreasonable philosophy. Log regarding Rational-emotive and you may Cognitive Behavioural Procedures, 20, 3-thirteen.

Akbalik, G. (2001). Catiflma cozme olce inin gecerlik ve guvenirlik calismas>. (the analysis out of authenticity away from reliability from Conflict Solution Scale). Turk Psikolojik Dan>flma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 16,7-thirteen

Clark, K. Greenberg, L. S. (1986). Differential effects of gestalt a couple-sofa intervention and you may problem solving inside solving desicional conflict. Journal off Counseling Mindset, 33,11-fifteen.

Next psychological intervention considering cognitive decisions principle might possibly be used to people in order to be focus on the that have impaired matchmaking viewpoints and its own adverse effects on their conflict solution procedure and change the impaired thinking

Cramer, D. (2004). Aftereffect of the latest malicious beliefs disgareement beliefs towards the relationships pleasure having aromantic mate otherwise companion. Therapy and you can Therapy, 77, 121-133.

Debord, J., Romans, S. C., Krieshok, T. (1996). Predictions dyadic modifications from general and dating particular values. Journal off Psychology, 130, 263-280.

DeForest, P. Hughes, J.(1992). Treatments for parent-teenage dispute thanks to behavioural techonology training: research study. Journal regarding Informative Emotional Appointment, step three,281-301.

DiGuiseppe, R. Zee, C. (1986). A rational emotive theory from marital breakdown and relationship medication. Record out of Rational emotive and you may Cognitive Behavioral Cures, cuatro, 22-37.

Unrealistic thinking regarding systematic lovers: The link to requirement, wants and you may fulfillment

Eidelson, R. J. Epstein, N. (1982). Cognition and you will dating maladjustment: Development of a way of measuring impaired relationship beliefs. Journal off Consulting and you may Systematic Therapy, fifty, 715-720.

Emmelkamp, P. Grams., Krol, B., Sanderman, R., Ruphan, Meters. (1987). The fresh new research of relationship philosophy inside the relationship framework. Personality and you will Individual Variations, 8, 775-780.

Epstein, N., Baucom., D. H., Rankin, L. A beneficial. (1993). Therapy of marital disagreement: an intellectual behavioral strategy. Clinical Mindset Opinion, 13, 45-57.

Epstein, Letter., Finnegan, B. Bythell, D. (1979). Unreasonable philosophy and you can impression from relationship disagreement. Diary of Contacting and Systematic Therapy, 47, 608-610.

Epstein, Letter., Pretzer, J. L. Fleming, B. (1987). The part from cognitive appraisal in thinking-accounts away from relationship communication. Behavior Therapy, 18, 51-69.

Eryuksel, An effective. (1996). Anne baba ve ergen iliflkilerinin situation cozme iletiflim becerileri biliflsel carptmalar ve aile yaps acsndan incelenmesi.(The investigation out-of friends family members with regards to problem solving, correspondence event, cognitive deformation and family unit members construction). Yaynlanmamls Doktora Tezi. (Unpublished learn thesis) Ege Univeristesi.